ΞΑΝΑ Η ΑΠΑΝΤΗΣΗ ΣΤΟ ΑΓΓΛΙΚΟ ΚΑΝΑΛΙ ΓΙΑ ΤΗΝ ΕΘΝΙΚΟΤΗΤΑ ΤΟΥ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΥ

Σάββατο, 18 Οκτωβρίου 2008 9:33 πμ |

n1424488038_30099967_2796.jpg

I ALWAYS KEEP AN EYE ON MACEDONIA...

Καλείστε όλοι να στείλετε την πιο κάτω επιστολή ως ανταπάντηση στο Αγγλικό κανάλι που ανέφερε τον Μέγα Αλέξανδρο ως σκοπιανό. (takeitorleaveit@tigeraspect.co.uk , general@tigeraspect.co.uk, culture@greekembassy.org.uk, pressoffice@greekembassy.org.uk , minister@mfa.gr , deligianni@greekembassy.org.uk ) . Επίσης, συνιστούμε όπως προωθήσετε άλλη ανάρτηση του αποσπάσματος του τηλεπαιχνιδιού, διότι η γνωστή ανάρτηση που είδαμε όλοι μας στο YouTube αναρτήθηκε από Βαρδάριους (σκοπιανούς), και περιέχει έντονη αλυτρωτική προπαγάνδα των Σκοπίων. Δεν υπάρχει κανένας λόγος να προωθούμε την προπαγάνδα τους, και γι'; αυτό έχουμε αναρτήσει ξανά το απόσπασμα, με δικά μας σχόλια στο περιθώριο ("more info"), όσο και δικά μας "annotations" μέσα στο βίντεο. Δείτε την εδώ: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgAxEeibJ8E Μην καθυστερείτε λοιπόν. Στείλετε την ανταπάντησή σας στους κυρίους του καναλιού. Όχι τίποτα άλλο, αλλά για να δούμε αν οι κύριοι αυτοί είναι το ίδιο χοντρόπετσοι, αδιάφοροι, κυνικοί και είρωνες για την δική τους πατρίδα, την δική τους ιστορία, την δική τους ταυτότητα και τον δικό τους Μέγα Αλφρέδο, όσο είναι για τον δικό μας Μέγα Αλέξανδρο.
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your reply. But I believe your answer is not nearly an apology, nor an attempt to correct your mistake whatsoever. It is rather considered by all Geek-Hellenes Macedon';s an amateur legalistic attempt to evade the issue.
You say: "On the question itself, we have looked back at the records, and subject to procedure this was checked with two trusted sources."
This is highly problematic. Who are your "two trusted sources"? This is not a police inquiry, where you have "two trusted sources/informants" that report to you on a particular issue. We are talking here about something that happened publicly, and the video is available and on the public domain. I understand and I respect your good will, but the issue is of immense importance, it penetrates into sensitive political issues and the relations of two states, and has to do with world history, and it';s not a matter of "two trusted sources". There are myriads of sources of every type and kind you can imagine (cultural, ethnological, historical, political, sociological, archaeological and so on) that prove without the slightest doubt that Alexander the Great was Hellene Macedonian which for your information is Greek.
As an initial "mega-source", we can direct you to this pdf file (
http://www.esnips.com/nsdoc/3303da4a-7394-40bc-9af2-d0479da8f3a8/) which is comprised of 1250 pages with scholarly articles and trusted PUBLIC sources that prove our argument. And here are several ancient sources that confirm, without any doubt whatsoever, the Greeknesss of the Alexander the Great: http://history-of-macedonia.com/wordpress/2006/10/18/greek-ancestry-of-alexander-the-great/. Did your "two trusted sources" take into consideration any of the above evidence?
Apologizing for the flag of FYROM is not enough. Because, yes, at that time neither FYROM nor Greece existed in the form of state that they exist today. And as I recall, neither a "Macedonian" country exists today but only one that is incorrectly called FYROM. But this does not change the fact that Alexander the Great was a Greek from Macedonia-Hellas. In the same fashion, England did not exist as a modern nation-state in 800-900 AD either, but this didn';t stop Alfred the Great, King of Wessex to liberate the English people from Viking occupation.
Therefore, I ask you, in the same fashion that you asked the players: What nationality was King Alfred the Great? English or Wessexian?
Which is the correct answer? Does that answer negate the other?
Awaiting for your reply,
Once more extremely disappointed.